<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Lawyers Admit To gmail Privacy Leak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/</link>
	<description>B2C stands for "Bingo To Customer"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How private Amazon.com is? &#171; Davor&#8217;s Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>How private Amazon.com is? &#171; Davor&#8217;s Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] private Amazon.com&#160;is?   I was reading  this article about Gmail admits privacy Leak. What worries me more then Google privacy is an Amazon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] private Amazon.com&nbsp;is?   I was reading  this article about Gmail admits privacy Leak. What worries me more then Google privacy is an Amazon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe K</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Yeah - class actions are a real scam.  They forced the auto industry to actually recall cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; class actions are a real scam.  They forced the auto industry to actually recall cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 75,000+ gmail accounts compromised by Google, brags Google lawyer in filing</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 75,000+ gmail accounts compromised by Google, brags Google lawyer in filing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] This is unreal: Google voluntarily &quot;peaked&quot; at the contents of over 75,000 gmail accounts to convince a judge that they were eager to settle a lawsuit. Specifically, they checked whether a message a Google-affiliated law firm had sent was marked as spam or not. The whole thing is recounted in a linked pdf-ed legal filing. Do no evil, huh?read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is unreal: Google voluntarily &quot;peaked&quot; at the contents of over 75,000 gmail accounts to convince a judge that they were eager to settle a lawsuit. Specifically, they checked whether a message a Google-affiliated law firm had sent was marked as spam or not. The whole thing is recounted in a linked pdf-ed legal filing. Do no evil, huh?read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eteraz</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>eteraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>also, they are merely following what&#039;s permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23. Hope you got a lot of hits out of dissing Google.

Wish I would have thunked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, they are merely following what&#8217;s permitted by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23. Hope you got a lot of hits out of dissing Google.</p>
<p>Wish I would have thunked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eteraz</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>eteraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>i just read the post and not the comments:

the email is not spam b/c it informs an individual about their individual rights.

it is a form of legal process. no spam ever does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just read the post and not the comments:</p>
<p>the email is not spam b/c it informs an individual about their individual rights.</p>
<p>it is a form of legal process. no spam ever does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex &#124; Orwell</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex &#124; Orwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t mind, Google can look at my emails as much as they want as long as I am using their free service. I have to admit that when I signed up to Gmail I knew my stuff would be looked at - not ecactly looked at by some mid-level manager at Google but at least some bot of sorts.

Great read, and your right about class actions being a scam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t mind, Google can look at my emails as much as they want as long as I am using their free service. I have to admit that when I signed up to Gmail I knew my stuff would be looked at &#8211; not ecactly looked at by some mid-level manager at Google but at least some bot of sorts.</p>
<p>Great read, and your right about class actions being a scam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>First, they didn&#039;t share it.
Second, they effectively used a shell script to search for an email and double check that it wasn&#039;t marked as spam. I seriously doubt any humans actually read said mail.
Do you have a problem with an indexed version of your email being scanned by a machine to make sure you get important documents? Oh, wait. That already happens anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, they didn&#8217;t share it.<br />
Second, they effectively used a shell script to search for an email and double check that it wasn&#8217;t marked as spam. I seriously doubt any humans actually read said mail.<br />
Do you have a problem with an indexed version of your email being scanned by a machine to make sure you get important documents? Oh, wait. That already happens anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Uh.. technically if its in their posession its theirs.. its on their property.. kinda like if i built something on ur land and u took it.. then well i cant do anything about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh.. technically if its in their posession its theirs.. its on their property.. kinda like if i built something on ur land and u took it.. then well i cant do anything about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: besttanning</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>besttanning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Email should be like the regular mail.  No one can tamper with it unless it addressed to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email should be like the regular mail.  No one can tamper with it unless it addressed to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgot</title>
		<link>http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>cgot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/googles-lawyers-admit-to-gmail-privacy-leak/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>First china, now this. Whatever happend to &quot;don&#039;t be evil&quot;?


--------------------
check out my blog at
http://spanishnow.wordpress.com
--------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First china, now this. Whatever happend to &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
check out my blog at<br />
<a href="http://spanishnow.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://spanishnow.wordpress.com</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
