Comments on: Another Plug for e-junkie http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=another-plug-for-e-junkie Patrick McKenzie (patio11) blogs on software development, marketing, and general business topics Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:17:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Patrick http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-439 Patrick Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:58:05 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-439 In that case, I'd recommend that you use e-junkie for the order processing and some sort of commodity web hosting for the actual downloading. I think my GoDaddy hosting account comes with 50 GB of disk space and more bandwidth than I could shake a stick at. In that case, I’d recommend that you use e-junkie for the order processing and some sort of commodity web hosting for the actual downloading. I think my GoDaddy hosting account comes with 50 GB of disk space and more bandwidth than I could shake a stick at.

]]> By: Dale Cunningham http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-440 Dale Cunningham Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:41:49 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-440 Is there an alternative that can be used for a small number of large products? I sell audio loop libraries and my products range form about 150mb to 400mb, EJunkie and all the alternatives Ive seen seem to charge through the nose for storage space for some reason. I need a service that doesn't care how much storage I use and charges a reasonable monthly fee (read $20 -$40 per month) . Is there an alternative that can be used for a small number of large products? I sell audio loop libraries and my products range form about 150mb to 400mb, EJunkie and all the alternatives Ive seen seem to charge through the nose for storage space for some reason.

I need a service that doesn’t care how much storage I use and charges a reasonable monthly fee (read $20 -$40 per month) .

]]> By:   An Alternative E-Commerce Shopping Cart Solution: E-Junkie? by TimeForBlogging http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-441   An Alternative E-Commerce Shopping Cart Solution: E-Junkie? by TimeForBlogging Mon, 14 May 2007 23:15:48 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-441 [...] Another Plug for e-junkie (More on E-Junkie from a regular user) [...] [...] Another Plug for e-junkie (More on E-Junkie from a regular user) [...]

]]> By: Robin K http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-438 Robin K Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:30:46 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-438 A CNAME record will do the trick as well. A CNAME record will do the trick as well.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-437 Patrick Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:43:44 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-437 Thats not a half bad idea, actually. Thats not a half bad idea, actually.

]]> By: Eric D. Burdo http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-436 Eric D. Burdo Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:51:24 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-436 Patrick, have you tried .htaccess redirects to mask the purchase URL's? I do that one several of my sites. Works well (use a 302 (or temporary) redirect, not a 301 (permanent)) for me. Patrick, have you tried .htaccess redirects to mask the purchase URL’s? I do that one several of my sites. Works well (use a 302 (or temporary) redirect, not a 301 (permanent)) for me.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-433 Patrick Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:42:58 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-433 Yeah, both e-junkie and payloadz (accent on the z, naturally) have that perception problem. Luckily, unless you hover over my links you never actually see the e-junkie branding anywhere. The email is from @bingocardcreator.com, its text is 100% written by me, the first page you see pop up after clicking on Purchase Now says "Paypal" on it, and then after the purchase is completed you're magically back to Bingo Card Creator territory. Unless you're watching a status bar e-junkie plays no part in the transaction for you. :) That was one of my original reasons for dropping payloadz, incidentally. They allowed me to include a message along with their email, but the email was still from @payloadz.com and some of the language did not exactly match my corporate image. Yeah, both e-junkie and payloadz (accent on the z, naturally) have that perception problem. Luckily, unless you hover over my links you never actually see the e-junkie branding anywhere. The email is from @bingocardcreator.com, its text is 100% written by me, the first page you see pop up after clicking on Purchase Now says “Paypal” on it, and then after the purchase is completed you’re magically back to Bingo Card Creator territory. Unless you’re watching a status bar e-junkie plays no part in the transaction for you. :)

That was one of my original reasons for dropping payloadz, incidentally. They allowed me to include a message along with their email, but the email was still from @payloadz.com and some of the language did not exactly match my corporate image.

]]> By: Brian http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-435 Brian Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:03:32 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-435 One more question: isn't the name e-junkie turn the user off? I for one wouldn't trust a junkie and wouldn't give my ca$h to a company called e-junkie. Don't they have an alternative marketed more blandly, such as, I don't know.. Secura E-Commerce Provider would be a good name because it suggests security? One of the reason I'm using Element 5 is their corporate image. Ok, they don't have a flashy site, but they are not a junkie or hooker either. I wonder if this comment will get eaten by the great anti-spam guardian which is protecting this blog. :) One more question: isn’t the name e-junkie turn the user off? I for one wouldn’t trust a junkie and wouldn’t give my ca$h to a company called e-junkie.

Don’t they have an alternative marketed more blandly, such as, I don’t know.. Secura E-Commerce Provider would be a good name because it suggests security?

One of the reason I’m using Element 5 is their corporate image. Ok, they don’t have a flashy site, but they are not a junkie or hooker either.

I wonder if this comment will get eaten by the great anti-spam guardian which is protecting this blog. :)

]]> By: Robin http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-434 Robin Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:07:19 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-434 Brian, E-junkie supports windows DLL & executable KeyGens as well. Brian, E-junkie supports windows DLL & executable KeyGens as well.

]]> By: Brian http://www.kalzumeus.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-432 Brian Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:16:37 +0000 http://microisvjournal.wordpress.com/2006/09/11/another-plug-for-e-junkie/#comment-432 I use Element 5 (ShareIt) because they can call my Windows DLL to generate the registration code. This is very cool. Plimus supports this for Linux DLLs or something, unfortunately they don't support Windows DLLs, which SUCKS. I use Element 5 (ShareIt) because they can call my Windows DLL to generate the registration code. This is very cool.

Plimus supports this for Linux DLLs or something, unfortunately they don’t support Windows DLLs, which SUCKS.

]]>